Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Kardiol Pol ; 81(5): 463-471, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2261775

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a great medical challenge as it provokes acute respiratory distress and has pulmonary manifestations and cardiovascular (CV) consequences. AIMS: This study compared cardiac injury in COVID-19 myocarditis patients with non-COVID-19 myocarditis patients. METHODS: Patients who recovered from COVID-19 were scheduled for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) owing to clinical myocarditis suspicion. The retrospective non-COVID-19 myocarditis (2018-2019) group was enrolled (n = 221 patients). All patients underwent contrast-enhanced CMR, the conventional myocarditis protocol, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The COVID study group included 552 patients at a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 45.9 (12.6) years. RESULTS: CMR assessment confirmed myocarditis-like LGE in 46% of the cases (68.5% of the segments with LGE <25% transmural extent), left ventricular (LV) dilatation in 10%, and systolic dysfunction in 16% of cases. The COVID-19 myocarditis group showed a smaller median (interquartile range [IQR]) LV LGE (4.4% [2.9%-8.1%] vs. 5.9% [4.4%-11.8%]; P <0.001), lower LV end-diastolic volume (144.6 [125.5-178] ml vs. 162.8 [136.6-194] ml; P <0.001), limited functional consequence (left ventricular ejection fraction, 59% [54.1%-65%] vs. 58% [52%-63%]; P = 0.01), and a higher rate of pericarditis (13.6% vs. 6%; P = 0.03) compared to non-COVID-19 myocarditis. The COVID-19-induced injury was more frequent in septal segments (2, 3, 14), and non-COVID-19 myocarditis showed higher affinity to lateral wall segments (P <0.01). Neither obesity nor age was associated with LV injury or remodeling in subjects with COVID-19 myocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19-induced myocarditis is associated with minor LV injury with a significantly more frequent septal pattern and a higher pericarditis rate than non-COVID-19 myocarditis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Myocarditis , Pericarditis , Humans , Middle Aged , Myocarditis/etiology , Myocarditis/complications , Contrast Media , Stroke Volume , Gadolinium , Ventricular Function, Left , Retrospective Studies , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine/methods , COVID-19/complications , Myocardium/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Predictive Value of Tests
2.
Pol Merkur Lekarski ; 50(299): 312-317, 2022 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2083590

ABSTRACT

Native heart valve thrombosis (NHVT) is a rare valvular pathology, usually associated with prothrombotic state or disturbed intracardiac blood flow related to structural valve abnormalities. While different venous and arterial thromboembolic complications of COVID-19 have been widely described, so far NHVT has not been reported in the context of the disease. The authors describe 4 cases of NHVT associated with COVID-19, revealed on aortic, mitral (2 patients) and tricuspid valve. In a 29-yearold male with mild pneumonia, large thrombus developed on bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), which resulted in fatal brain emboli. In a 76-yearold male with a history of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) being in a recovery period after COVID-19, central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) was the first sign of mitral valve thrombus, which disappeared after 3 weeks, during apixaban use. Such therapy was also successful in a 46-yearold female with multiple cardiovascular risk factors in whom mitral valve thrombus was found in a routine echocardiography after she got COVID-19 the third time. In a 75-year-old man with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia and bacterial coinfection, coexistent transient focal LV dysfunction and tricuspid valve thrombus were observed. The patient was treated with apixaban as well; however, in this case only reduction in the thrombus size was seen after 4 months therapy. The authors indicate that in patients with COVID-19 and NHVT, other prothrombotic conditions can usually be found. This complication may involve different valves and occur irrespective of COVID-19 severity. Interdisciplinary evaluation of such patients is necessary.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Thrombosis , Heart Diseases , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , COVID-19/complications , Mitral Valve , Tricuspid Valve
3.
Pol Merkur Lekarski ; 50(298): 249-252, 2022 Aug 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2011302

ABSTRACT

Arterial thromboembolic events (ATE) in COVID-19, similarly as venous thromboembolism (VTE), are observed mainly in severely ill patients. ATE include brain, heart, aortic, and peripheral ischemic complications which usually aggravate a course of the disease leading to lifethreatening conditions. A CASE REPORT: The authors describe a case of a 53-year-old male with Duhring disease in the remission period admitted due to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The patient was treated with ceftriaxone (2000 mg once daily), dexamethasone (8 mg once daily), enoxaparin (60 mg twice daily), baricitinib (4 mg once daily), and remdesivir (200 mg on the first day, followed by 100 mg within 4 consecutive days); he required high flow oxygen therapy. On day 5 of hospitalization, he began to suffer from pain of the right lower extremity; in physical examination the limb was cold with absent femoral, popliteal, and pedal pulses. Urgent computed tomography angiography revealed total occlusion of the right superficial femoral artery (SFA) in the absence of any atherosclerotic plaques in the aorta. The patient was intubated and transferred to department of vascular surgery, where a giant clot was removed from SFA. Unfortunately, the patient outcome was unfavorable due to respiratory failure progression. The authors underline that ATE may occur even in anticoagulated patients and that association of some therapeutic options of COVID-19, like janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors use with an increased risk of ATE, should not be excluded.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Dermatitis Herpetiformis , Azetidines , COVID-19/complications , Femoral Artery/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Purines , Pyrazoles , Sulfonamides
4.
Pol Merkur Lekarski ; 50(296): 118-123, 2022 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1790558

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 patients, particularly those with severe pulmonary involvement, are at an increased thromboembolic risk related, among various causes, to the cytokine storm and excessive activation of the coagulation cascade and platelets. Different intensity of anticoagulation for them is proposed, mainly with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs); in a confirmed pulmonary embolism (PE) the therapeutic dose of LMWH is routinely used. Some authors suggest that hemorrhagic complications in COVID-19 patients are rare. At the same time, one can find reports on internal bleeding, including retroperitoneal hematoma (RPH) and other abdominal hematomas. CASE REPORTS: The authors describe 5 cases (3 of those aged more than 80 years) with giant RPHs and with moderate/severe COVID-19 pneumonia, treated before RPH diagnosis with different enoxaparin doses. The therapeutic dose was given to the male with verified PE limited to the segmental/subsegmental pulmonary arteries and initially to the female in whom echocardiography was strongly suggestive of PE, yet this diagnosis was excluded on CT angiography. In one patient, the enoxaparin dose was escalated from 40 mg bd to 60 mg bd after the D-dimer increase. Two patients had bleeding complications despite the enoxaparin dose restricted to 40 mg/daily or bd. Two males had a coexistent psoas hematoma while in only one female there was a coexistent femoral hematoma. RPHs occurred between day 4 and 14 of hospitalization and all were treated conservatively. Three patients who died were particularly charged, so their deaths were not merely directly associated with RPH, which was closely analyzed in one autopsy performed. The authors underline that the choice of anticoagulation intensity in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia without venous thromboembolism seems sometimes difficult but recent publications indicate the low prophylactic enoxaparin dose as an optimal option. Anticoagulation dose escalation based only on the D-dimer level may not be appropriate for certain patients; moreover, the D-dimer increase is commonly observed during internal bleeding.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants , COVID-19/complications , Enoxaparin/adverse effects , Enoxaparin/therapeutic use , Female , Hematoma/chemically induced , Hematoma/drug therapy , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL